Search for: "Mark McGinley"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
The allegedly infringing McGinley Image appears at the 51–second mark, spliced between video of a shadowy figure standing on a wooden post and a shirtless adolescent leaping through the spray of sparks from a firecracker. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:45 am
“Justice Department says FDA ‘lacks jurisdiction’ over death-penalty drugs”: Laurie McGinley and Mark Berman of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 1:44 pm
Other confirmed speakers include: David Leightty, Ken Dau-Schmidt, Mark Rothstein, Robert Hillman, James Fogle, Tom Williams, Ann McGinley, Marty Malin, Vickie Lipnic, Barry Kearny, Bonnie Glantz Fatell, Paul Friedman, Carolyn Wheeler, and Charles Powell. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
McGinley, 660 F.2d 41 (Fed Cir. 1981). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:00 am
Upon rehearing en banc, the Federal Circuit overturned McGinley in its 9-3 decision. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:02 am
As to the constitutionality of Section 2(a), the CAFC deemed that argument foreclosed by In re McGinley, which held that because the refusal to register a mark did not affect the applicant's right to use the mark, "[n]o conduct is proscribed, and no tangible from of expression is suppressed. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:02 am
Moore's inclusion of "additional views" in the CAFC's original opinion, concerning the constitutionality of Section 2(a), in which she urged that the court re-visit the CCPA's 1981 decision in In re McGinley in view of the subsequent evolution of First Amendment jurisprudence.The court's Order requests that the parties file new briefs addressing the following question: "Does the bar on registration of disparaging marks in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
Commentators heavilycriticized McGinley and our continued reliance on it,particularly in light of the many changes to FirstAmendment jurisprudence over the last thirty years. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:10 am
McGinley, Nicole C. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 10:07 am
” And online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Lawless Ruling Against the Abortion Pill Has Already Prompted a Constitutional Crisis; This unprecedented abuse of judicial power with no basis in law or fact will soon force the Supreme Court’s hand. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:21 pm
See McGinley, 660 F.2d at 487 (Rich, J., dissenting) (“More ‘public funds’ are being expended in the prosecution of this appeal than would ever result from the registration of the mark. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
William McGinley, Mechanisms and microfoundations in International Relations theory Ellen Gutterman, The legitimacy of transnational NGOs: lessons from the experience of Transparency International in Germany and France [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:11 pm
See In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481, 211 USPQ 668 (C.C.P.A. 1981); TMEP §1203.01. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
McGinley, Nicole C. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
The Federal Circuit panel affirmed based on In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481 (CCPA 1981), which found no First Amendment violation since the applicant was free to use the mark without the registration. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:34 am
In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481 (C.C.P.A. 1981). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
McGinley, and Hollee M. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
McGinley, and Hollee M. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
In light of what has transpired, perhaps the McGinley court’s approach has some virtues. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 9:25 am
This restriction was imported into the Lanham Act in 1946 and withstood a constitutional challenge in the 1981 case In re McGinley where the government successfully argued a refusal to register a mark does not implicate an applicant’s First Amendment rights because the applicant can still use the mark as he or she pleases, just without federal trademark protection. [read post]
